If managers strategize by clock time in 20-year projects (e.g. FAANG from startup to giants), and makers operate by event time in 5-year projects (e.g. FOSS "pet" projects)... what does that leave the "tech lead" in 10-year product tactical maneuvers (e.g. digital transformation)?
I like the ship, show, ask approach for PRs, too often they're adding friction for no good reason.
That's true — I understand the importance of PRs but they are truly at odds with continuous delivery.
Makers and manager sounds like these two concepts https://studio.ribbonfarm.com/p/maker-studio-manager-studio https://kadavy.net/blog/posts/clock-time-event-time/
If managers strategize by clock time in 20-year projects (e.g. FAANG from startup to giants), and makers operate by event time in 5-year projects (e.g. FOSS "pet" projects)... what does that leave the "tech lead" in 10-year product tactical maneuvers (e.g. digital transformation)?